Jim's Blog

By Jim DeBeaugrine February 16, 2026
Wednesday, February 11, marked the halfway point of the 2026 Regular Session of the Florida Legislature—assuming adjournment occurs on schedule, which remains uncertain. Tensions between the House and Senate persist, with significant disagreements on major initiatives and even routine procedural matters such as budget timing. Although initial budget proposals typically appear in weeks three or four, both chambers released theirs at the end of week five. Despite the noise, the legislative process is moving forward. A clearer picture is emerging of which bills are likely to pass and where each chamber is prioritizing funding. Budget Highlights iBudget Waiver Both chambers allocate $22 million (with federal matching funds) to the iBudget waiver but differ in approach: House: Directs funds to reduce the waiting list. Senate: Applies funds to an across the board provider rate increase. Each chamber also makes use of the $1 billion+ surplus accumulated in the iBudget waiver and reappropriated to APD: Senate: $45.3 million for workforce recruitment and retention $27.5 million to address salary deficits at two state institutions caused by declining federal revenue House: Sweeps $300 million back into General Revenue through immediate reversion iConnect System Replacement Both chambers support replacing the iConnect system but propose different oversight and procurement strategies: House: $33.5 million with detailed proviso language Requires a third party entity to assist with system specifications and procurement Mandates project monitoring by a Department of Management Services professional Senate: $2.4 million for procurement support through iLab Requires legislative approval in a future General Appropriations Act before issuing procurement Both chambers retain language allowing providers to maintain required data in their own systems and electronically transfer it to iConnect, and both prohibit compliance monitoring or recoupments tied to iConnect. Budget Conforming Bills Affecting APD Conforming bills make permanent statutory changes needed to implement budget priorities. Senate: Requires the Social Services Estimating Conference to forecast enrollment, utilization, and expenditures for the managed care pilot program for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. AHCA must collect and report necessary data to support the conference. House: Directs DCF to establish a program helping individuals with disabilities obtain Medicaid, implemented through a qualified nonprofit Authorizes funding transfers between iBudget and the Managed Care Pilot Program when individuals move between programs Other Bills to Watch Several nonbudget bills appear well positioned for passage: HB 915 / SB 1016: Codifies income and asset limits for individuals with I/DD (House bill cleared; Senate bill in final committee) HB 453 / SB 556: Allows Special Olympics participation to satisfy high school PE requirements (House passed; Senate nearing final action) HB 565 / SB 794: Addresses APD operations, including core competencies for support coordinators (active in both chambers) SB 418 / HB 365: Establishes a voluntary “Blue Envelope” program for individuals on the Autism spectrum and mandates law enforcement training (Senate passed; House progressing) HB 859 / SB 1170: Requires video cameras in self contained exceptional education classrooms (House passed; Senate advancing) This is not a comprehensive list, and bills unlikely to pass are intentionally excluded. For the status of additional legislation, visit our tracking page or contact us directly .
By Jim DeBeaugrine January 13, 2026
As this piece is being finalized, the 128th regular session of the Florida Legislature is kicking off with the Governor’s State of the State address. As he speaks for the final time as Governor, the political intrigue is as thick as the winter fog on Apalachee Bay. It does not appear to be lifting any time soon as intense political rivalries have developed within the Republican party. Agreements that would normally be discreetly hashed out among party leaders behind closed doors are erupting into high-profile controversies. These include major disagreements over how to handle issues such as mid-decade Congressional redistricting and property tax reform. Likewise, there will be competitive Republican primaries in several statewide races, most notably for Governor. It is perhaps fortunate that, unlike the past couple of sessions, it appears that it will be a relatively quiet session as it relates to issues that affect individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD). While we are tracking many bills of interest to the I/DD community which you can follow here , they are generally narrowly focused rather than systemic reforms. But a word of caution is in order: things can and do frequently turn on a dime during the 60-day session. It is important that advocates follow the process in real time to make sure they are not blind-sided. Even in a quiet year, there are important decisions that will be made during the session. Here are the main issues that we are tracking: State Budget Both the agency request and Governor’s recommended budget are essentially continuation budgets. Click here for a more detailed description. The biggest ticket item is a recommendation from the Governor to provide approximately $47 million to serve approximately 1,200 individuals in pre-enrollment (waiting list) categories 1 and 2 (crisis and foster care). The Governor also recommends providing full-year funding for the managed care pilot program in the Agency for Healthcare Administration which was partially funded in the current year. However, he does not recommend further expansion of the program. He recommends several agency requests for administrative infrastructure at APD and for repairs and maintenance at the two remaining institutions in Marianna and Gainesville. He also proposes continued development of a new forensic facility that would be built on the grounds of Mariana Sunland. The Governor also recommends increased budget authority to spend additional Federal funding expected to be available for Vocational Rehabilitation. Provider Rates Provider rates are a perennial issue and will once again be top priorities for provider associations such as the Arc of Florida, FARF and the waiver support coordinators. APD providers were among the beneficiaries of two different initiatives by former Senate presidents Wilton Simpson and Kathleen Passidomo to increase salaries paid to direct care staff and improve access to health care services. They resulted in significant rate increases to APD providers. However, provider rates were not adjusted last session despite inflationary pressure, and many providers continue to report difficulties maintaining sufficient staffing and covering increased costs of doing business such as insurance. Utilization data as well as anecdotal reports from families suggest that accessing authorized services is increasingly difficult due to lack of provider capacity. There will also be a concerted effort during the upcoming session to increase and standardize rates paid for transportation provided through the waiver. APD rates for transportation, unlike most other APD services, are individually negotiated with each provider. The result is a highly fragmented and arguably inequitable rate structure that bears little relationship to the actual cost of providing service. Rates established by the local Transportation Disadvantaged Coordinators are based on actual costs of providing service and are being offered as an appropriate benchmark for APD to use in establishing a uniform rate structure. Neither the agency request nor the Governor’s recommended budget contain funding for provider rate increases. iConnect iConnect is the IT system developed by APD over the course of the last 10 years for client and case management and other agency functions. Since its inception, the system has been plagued by substantial implementation delays, obsolete technology, and serious concerns with usability and reliability among system users. The many issues associated with iConnect came to a head last session with the Legislature mandating a plan to replace the system. iLab was the IT consultant hired by APD to develop a Legislatively mandated report to establish high-level business requirements for an iConnect replacement and identify capable vendors. The report identifies a “short list” of three vendors that it recommends be considered to provide a replacement system. These finalists are: Therap Services, a well-known niche company that specializes in supporting I/DD organizations; HHA Exchange, a company primarily known for its Electronic Visit Verification system that has recently acquired a couple of case management vendors; and Redmane, a vendor that is not well known in the I/DD world but has recently engaged with the Department of Children and Family Services for child welfare support and with APD for an incident management system. Waiting List As mentioned above, $47 million (inclusive of Federal matching funds) are requested/recommended to address the waiting list. The Governor’s recommended budget, however, only recommends funding for pre-enrollment categories 1 and 2 which include individuals in crisis and children from the foster care system who are transitioning out. APD by its own initiative recently sent out roughly 5,000 offer letters to individuals on the waiting list. The response so far has been surprisingly anemic. The last we heard, there were 1,000 individuals enrolled, but the great majority of letters have gone unanswered. This is a clear indication that there are issues with waiting list management and/or communicating with individuals and families on the waiting list. Managed Care Pilot Program Implementation The managed care pilot program recently expanded to all individuals in the state on the waiting list. In October 2026, eligibility will again expand to allow people who are currently enrolled in iBudget or the Long-term Managed Care program to voluntarily enroll. Since the latest expansion, enrollment has grown from just over 300 to almost 1,000 individuals. Funding provided by the Legislature is sufficient to support just over 2,000 enrollees. The evaluation of the pilot, which the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) now calls the Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Comprehensive Managed Care (ICMC) program, is due in 2029. The program combines medical care and an expanded array of home and community-based services into a single capitated plan administered by Florida Community Care and overseen by AHCA. It is a Legislative initiative championed by the House Speaker and is being closely monitored by both the Legislature and stakeholders. Many self-advocates and family members are monitoring developments with the pilot program and are urging policy makers to maintain its current policy that allows the individual to choose between iBudget and managed care. DD Day at the Capitol Mark your calendars for February 10, which is DD Day at the Capitol for 2026. This event, sponsored by the Florida Developmental Disabilities Council, will bring self-advocates, family members, professionals, and advocates together at the Capitol to advocate for issues important to the stakeholder community. The Council, in particular, is focused on providing a venue for self-advocates and family members to communicate the importance of the services they receive in allowing them to lead productive lives in their communities. For more information, visit this page on the Council’s website. Other Issues Among the bills of particular interest to this writer are HB 915 (Tant) / SB 1016 (Bradley). These bills which are essentially identical would codify the ‘Working People with Disabilities’ program which allows individuals with I/DD who hold competitive employment to earn higher wages and maintain higher personal assets than would otherwise be allowed for Medicaid beneficiaries. Former Rep. Kathleen Peters, now a Pinellas County Commissioner, championed this program and successfully pushed for language in the state budget that started the program. However, this language technically expired several years ago. Although the agency still offers the program, it is important that clear statutory authority and direction exist to ensure that it continues as an option. There are also many other bills that we are tracking that would affect people with I/DD. They span the gamut from autism safety initiatives to individual education plan enhancements to APD administrative measures. I will be monitoring these bills with particular attention to the ones that appear to stand a legitimate chance of passage on this site so be sure to check back often. There are also other excellent resources available to you if you wish to follow the process. The Family Café hosts a weekly ‘Let’s Talk’ series where Legislative experts share news and lead discussions on emerging issues each Friday during session. For more information visit the Café’s website . The Florida Developmental Disabilities Council will also be maintaining bill tracking information on this page on its website. And finally, you can go straight to the source – the websites of the House and Senate . Also, a good starting point is the Legislature's Online Sunshine website.
By Jim DeBeaugrine March 31, 2025
Last week marked the beginning of the budget process in the Florida Legislature during the fourth week of the annual nine-week session. Chair recommendations from various budget subcommittees were released over several days and served as the basis for the House and Senate budgets, which were printed on Friday. In the area of intellectual and developmental disabilities, there are notable differences between the House and Senate budgets. The House allocates $61.4 million for the waiting list, split between the traditional iBudget and the new managed care pilot, while the Senate does not provide any waiting list funding. The Senate allocates $50 million for Direct Support Professional recruitment and retention, an issue the House does not address. Additionally, the Senate budget proposes replacing the iConnect system, a client data management system, whereas the House budget requires a plan to fix the system. A high-level overview of each chamber's proposals is below for those interested. Each chamber will take up their budget bills in committee on Wednesday, where amendments can be considered. Typically, the House sees very few amendments proposed and none adopted, while the Senate is likely to consider and adopt dozens of amendments. Once the budgets pass out of committee, they will be considered by the full chambers, presenting another opportunity for amendments. Historically, the Senate adopts multiple amendments, while the House adopts none. After each chamber passes a budget, leadership will appoint a conference committee to reconcile the differences between the two bills. The conference process concludes with a conference report, which is considered by each chamber and is not subject to amendment. Once passed by both chambers, the bill is presented to the Governor, who has line-item veto authority. This unique power allows the Governor to veto specific spending items while approving the overall budget. After the budget is signed and vetoes are identified, the Governor’s Office of Policy and Budget begins establishing each agency’s operating budget. Any modifications to operating budgets are subject to Legislative review and, in some cases, approval by a joint Legislative committee composed of members from both chambers. House and Senate budget proposals overview Waiting list The House provides $62.4 million equally provided between the iBudget waiver and the I/DD managed care pilot funded in the Agency for Health Care Administration. The additional funding for the pilot project which is estimated to serve 547 additional individuals, is contingent on passage of HB 1103 or similar legislation that expands the pilot to a statewide program. The Senate does not provide funding for the waiting list but authorizes the Agency for Persons with Disabilities to enroll individuals in crisis into the iBudget Waiver from existing funding. Provider rate increases Both chambers provide $9.1 million for rate increases for Vocational Rehabilitation providers. The Senate provides $50 million from prior year unspent funds in the iBudget Waiver for recruitment and retention incentives for Direct Support Professionals. The Senate provides $1.3 million to increase rates paid for state funded services through the Individual and Family Supports category. iBudget The Senate provides $2 million to engage iLab (an IT consulting company which recently conducted the iConnect evaluation) to develop business, functional and technical requirements for a system to replace iConnect. The language also requires APD to develop procurement documents for the replacement system. The House provides $1.5 million of non-recurring funds and requires the agency to develop a plan by September 1, 2025 to make systems improvements to include enhanced interface capability with external provider systems. Dental services for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities Both chambers make significant reductions to funding for dental services previously provided through a contract with the Arc of Florida due to the funds mostly remaining unspent for the last several years. The House reduces funding by $6 million which leaves $5.5 million available for services. The Senate reduces funding by $7.9 million which leaves $3.6 million. Institutions The Senate provides $17.9 million for fixed capital outlay projects in the state-operated institutions. This includes funding for planning for a new forensic facility. The House provides $9.6 million for fixed capital outlay projects in the state-operated institutions. This includes $8.4 million for the new forensic facility which would be located in Marianna on the Sunland campus. The Senate provides $13 million in state funds to replace a shortfall in Federal earnings in the state institutions. In addition, $6.6 million is provided in the current fiscal year budget. The House does not address. Other issues Both chambers fund continuation of the dually diagnosed pilot program in Leon, Broward, Orange, and Hillsborough Counties but from different sources. The House provides $6.5 million from non-recurring funds which is the current funding level for the project while the Senate reappropriates funding that is expected to remain unspent during the current fiscal year. The House reduces the waiver budget by roughly $1.3 billion by eliminating what is called “double budgeting” of Federal funds earned by the Agency for Health Care Administration. While this results in a dramatic decrease for both the waiver and in APD’s total budget, this will not result in reduced services or provider payments. The House eliminates 355.5 positions and $21 million from the APD budget which are associated with positions that have been vacant for more than 90 days. The House provides $8.9 million for various local appropriations projects while the Senate provides $8.5 million. Both chambers reappropriate funding to competitively procure an automated incident management system. Both chambers provide for reappropriation of any unspent funding for the iBudget waiver.
Show More